Share an overview
01 / Introduction
Send a clear non-confidential explanation of the project, audience, stage, current difficulty and hoped-for outcome.
From introduction to action
A thoughtful process protects time, ideas and expectations. We aim for enough structure to make sound decisions without imposing an unnecessary program on every project.
The principle
An email should not automatically trigger a long diligence process. We begin with a non-confidential overview and ask whether there is a relevant problem, a plausible direction and a role for collaboration.
If a conversation becomes useful, scope and expectations can grow progressively. Each transition is a separate choice for the people involved.
A possible journey
These are illustrative stages rather than a promised timetable or acceptance pipeline.
01 / Introduction
Send a clear non-confidential explanation of the project, audience, stage, current difficulty and hoped-for outcome.
02 / Fit
Consider whether the subject, expected contribution, business stage and current priorities make further discussion worthwhile.
03 / Understanding
If invited, clarify the actual bottleneck, people involved, evidence, constraints and possible next decision.
04 / Feasibility
Agree what needs to be learned or built, who is involved, what resources are needed and how progress would be assessed.
05 / Terms
Where appropriate, document scope, ownership, confidentiality, commercial arrangements and exit or completion conditions.
06 / Execution
Work to defined milestones, learn from results and decide together whether to continue, adjust or conclude.
Respect for everyone’s time
Because we receive many introductions, we prioritize a limited number of opportunities and may not answer every message. Sending an idea does not establish a confidential, advisory or commercial relationship.
If there is a fit, the next step will be specific. If a project is not pursued, that should not prevent its founder from continuing independently or seeking other suitable collaborators.
Prepare your introductionQuestions worth asking
Clarity helps everyone decide whether a conversation is worth taking further.
There is no standard response window. We review selectively and cannot guarantee an individual reply.
A brief overview and a few relevant links are a better first step. Additional material can be requested if needed.
Only after the parties understand the proposed collaboration well enough to document responsibilities and conditions.
Yes. A concise update showing meaningful new evidence can help explain why the situation has changed.
Start a conversation
A clear story about the problem, what exists and what happens next is enough for an introduction.
Introduce your idea